Transformational
leaders try to develop their followers’ full potential (e.g., Bass, 1985;
Johnson & Dipboye, 2008); therefore, followers tend to feel that their
organization is effective and that it can provide future opportunity and
development. As such, it is expected that followers will be more likely to stay
in the organization because they are satisfying their needs for self-categorization/self-identity,
and they have a sense of being unique from other members in society.
Organizational identification is therefore likely to be strengthened.
Wang and Huang state in a 2009 article, that “in the last
few decades, within the field of leadership, transformational leadership
behaviour has come to represent the most effective form of close engagement
between leaders and followers that motivates the latter to perform beyond their
transactional agreements. Robbins (2001) defined transformational leaders as,
leaders who provide individualised consideration and intellectual stimulation,
and who possess charisma,” (p.381).
It was the late Bernard Bass (founding editor of the leadership quarterly journal) who back in 1990 attributed four behavioural characteristics to a transformational leader: charisma, inspirational motivation, intellectual stimulation and individualised consideration. It was only later, in 2003, when John Antonakis, Bruce Avolio and Nagaraj Sivasubramaniam replaced the characteristic of charisma with, what they termed, idealised influence.
Wang and Huang (2009) remind us that “a leader only possesses idealised influence if his or her followers seek to identify with, and want to emulate, him of her. This type of leader is admired, respected and trusted.” Further, “transformational leaders behave in ways that;
1) Motivate and inspire their followers by providing meaningful challenges;
2) Encourage followers to envision attractive future states, which they can ultimately envision for themselves; and
3) Aim to expand their followers efforts in terms of innovativeness and creativity by questioning assumptions, reframing problems and approaching old problems in new ways;” (p.381).
Research has also linked transformational leadership with levels of emotional intelligence. Where, for example, Wang and Huang mention that “emotional intelligence is an emerging topic within psychological, educational and management research, and that it was Daniel Goldman back in 1995 who suggested that the best predictor of who eventually emerges as a leader is based on emotional intelligence (EI), which includes abilities such as;
Self-Awareness;
Self-Management;
Self-Motivation;
Empathy; and
Social Skills.”
It was the late Bernard Bass (founding editor of the leadership quarterly journal) who back in 1990 attributed four behavioural characteristics to a transformational leader: charisma, inspirational motivation, intellectual stimulation and individualised consideration. It was only later, in 2003, when John Antonakis, Bruce Avolio and Nagaraj Sivasubramaniam replaced the characteristic of charisma with, what they termed, idealised influence.
Wang and Huang (2009) remind us that “a leader only possesses idealised influence if his or her followers seek to identify with, and want to emulate, him of her. This type of leader is admired, respected and trusted.” Further, “transformational leaders behave in ways that;
1) Motivate and inspire their followers by providing meaningful challenges;
2) Encourage followers to envision attractive future states, which they can ultimately envision for themselves; and
3) Aim to expand their followers efforts in terms of innovativeness and creativity by questioning assumptions, reframing problems and approaching old problems in new ways;” (p.381).
Research has also linked transformational leadership with levels of emotional intelligence. Where, for example, Wang and Huang mention that “emotional intelligence is an emerging topic within psychological, educational and management research, and that it was Daniel Goldman back in 1995 who suggested that the best predictor of who eventually emerges as a leader is based on emotional intelligence (EI), which includes abilities such as;
Self-Awareness;
Self-Management;
Self-Motivation;
Empathy; and
Social Skills.”
John
Ryan from the Center of Creative Leadership mentions that "as we explore
what's new and meaningful on the frontiers of leadership development, we do
know this: the context in which leadership happens is changing every day in
every sector. We are living in a VUCA world: one characterized by Volatility,
Uncertainty, Complexity and Ambiguity and will be for years to come. In a
dizzying swirl of socio-political upheaval, natural disasters and volatile
business markets, many of us stay awake at night wondering if our skills and
knowledge are enough to see us through tomorrow or the next quarter. Seeing
farther than that is even more daunting and yet we have to keep
searching."
The findings from Wang and Huang’s study “indicate that leaders exhibit more transformational leadership behaviour when they have the ability to perform self-emotional appraisals; others’ emotional appraisals; regulation of emotions and constructive use of emotions. Their findings support the view that emotional intelligence is an important variable for understanding and predicting transformational behaviour. Their results also contribute further evidence that transformational leadership influences not only individual level consequences, but also group level consequences,” (p.389).
The findings from Wang and Huang’s study “indicate that leaders exhibit more transformational leadership behaviour when they have the ability to perform self-emotional appraisals; others’ emotional appraisals; regulation of emotions and constructive use of emotions. Their findings support the view that emotional intelligence is an important variable for understanding and predicting transformational behaviour. Their results also contribute further evidence that transformational leadership influences not only individual level consequences, but also group level consequences,” (p.389).
Genuine
transformational leaders possess great referent and inspirational power (Bass,
1985) which enables them to gain the respect, admiration, and trust of their
followers. They are also seen as role models who exert significant and positive
influence on followers that creates a sense of meaningfulness (Bass, 1985).
Employees who experience a greater sense of meaning from their work are likely
to feel more empowered (Spreitzer, 1995) and proud of being a member of the
organization, and thereby enhance their identification with the organization
(Koberg et al., 1999).
In their
HBR article from 2012 Boris Groysberg and Michael Slind highlight that “smart
leaders today engage with employees in a way that resembles an ordinary
person-to-person conversation more than it does a series of commands from on
high. Furthermore, they initiate practices and foster cultural norms that
instill a conversational sensibility throughout their organizations. Chief
among the benefits of this approach is that it allows a large or growing
company to function like a small one. By talking with employees, rather than
simply issuing orders, leaders can retain or recapture some of the qualities
that encourage operational flexibility, high levels of employee engagement, and
tight strategic alignment.”
In the last few years transformational leadership has become one of the dominant leadership theories and applications for successful organisational development. Occasionally as a leader, it’s worth stepping back and asking; are you a leader who is admired, respected and trusted by your followers and your peers – do people in your organisation strive to be like you? An honest reflection will help you understand the difference between just being in a leadership position and actually being an effective transformational leader.
References:
Groysberg, B. and Slind, M. (2012). Leadership is a Conversation. Harvard Business Review. July.
In the last few years transformational leadership has become one of the dominant leadership theories and applications for successful organisational development. Occasionally as a leader, it’s worth stepping back and asking; are you a leader who is admired, respected and trusted by your followers and your peers – do people in your organisation strive to be like you? An honest reflection will help you understand the difference between just being in a leadership position and actually being an effective transformational leader.
References:
Groysberg, B. and Slind, M. (2012). Leadership is a Conversation. Harvard Business Review. July.
Ryan,
J.R. (2012). What's next for leadership? 5 big ideas. Center for Creative
Leadership Annual Report, 2011-2012.
Yung-Shui Wang and Tung-Chun Huang. (2009). The
Relationship of Transformational Leadership with Group Cohesiveness and
Emotional Intelligence. Social Behavior & Personality: An International
Journal; Vol. 37, Issue 3, p.379-392.
Zhu, W.,
Sosik, J.J., Riggio, R.E., and Yang, B. (2012). Relationships between
Transformational and Active Transactional Leadership and Followers’
Organizational Identification: The Role of Psychological Empowerment. Institute
of Behavioral and Applied Management. p.186-212.
No comments:
Post a Comment