“Vodafone
faces a fresh attack over its affairs after an investigation by the Sunday
Times revealed that the mobile phone giant paid no corporation tax in Britain
last year. Despite earning several hundred million pounds from its 19 million
customer, Vodafone shared none of these profits with HM Revenue and Custom in the
UK in the 12 months to the end of March, 2012”, (The Sunday Times, 10th
June 2012, Business, p.1). The revelation comes amid heightened scrutiny of the
tax bills of multinational companies as governments scramble to patch up their
public finances.
The
Sunday Times tell us that the underlying earnings before interest and tax at
Vodafone’s British operation rose from £1.2 billion to £1.3 billion in the year
end of March. Adjusted pre-tax profits rose from £348 million to £402 million
over the period. However, its British corporation tax bill fell from £140
million in the 12 months to 31st March, 2011, to zero in the year
just ended.
Vodafone,
Apple and scores of other multinationals have created subsidiaries in Luxemburg
in an attempt to minimise their tax bills in big markets such as Britain.
Luxemburg is an aggressive adversary when it comes to tax. On the surface, it
is a model international citizen, playing host to the European Court of Justice
and the secretariat of the European Parliament.
The
country is, nevertheless, exacerbating the crisis that threatens to smash apart
the single currency in Europe by denying governments billions in taxes.
Vodafone
and others aren’t breaking the law by doing this and are upholding their
responsibilities to their stakeholders through profit optimisation. Most people
aren’t that sympathetic towards the taxman at the best of times, so there will
be those that are saying ‘good for them’, just before instructing their broker
to buy shares in Vodafone.
But
this ‘clever manipulation’ raises a number of questions, like whether business
is operating on a fair and equitable playing field, where these benefits are
open to all that want them? But hold on – if they were, where would HMRC get
its tax income from? So, in what seems to be a common theme these days, there
appears to be two distinct sets of rules – one for the large and powerful
organisations and then for the rest.
As
much as I’d like to be critical towards Vodafone, I can’t actually fault what
their financial team are doing – in fact, as much as it pains me to say, one
has to applaud them for finding a way to optimise their financial returns to
their stakeholders – it’s what they’re paid to do.
So
the fault must sit with governments for not finding and closing these
loop-holes that allow the richest organisations to get away with not paying tax
in the country where they are generating vast profits. The same governments
that complain about the lack of money they have available to spend on
education, health and security, which leads them into borrowing a debt –
leading to recessions like we’re currently experiencing – it’s absolutely crazy.
While the big boys are sipping their champagne to a job well done - thee SME
sector is targeted, harassed and chased for even the slightest deviation from
their tax obligations – so how must they feel when they read stories like this?
It’s
worth noting that Amazon avoids even more tax by using a similar method. By
shuttling money through Luxemburg, it managed to pay no corporation tax in
Britain last year despite generating sales of more than £3 billion in the UK.
Call
me naïve, but one has to wonder just how much of an impact these practices have
had on the current austerity measures being employed by governments throughout
Europe.
It
would appear that big business is being allowed to blackmail and manipulate
governments by threatening to move their organisations offshore and lay people
off, if governments try to close these tax loopholes. But hello – these
governments aren’t getting any income from these organisations anyway – but
more importantly these governments are elected to ‘protect’ their citizens, so
where is the leadership that’s required to enforce the fair and equitable
gathering of taxes for the good of the nation.
When
you think about it, this practice seems to have been going on through the
centuries, where the hard working owners of small businesses were chased by the
taxman and severely punished for the slightest irregularity – to the extent
that organisations were closed and proud men lost everything. While at the
other end of the scale the wealthy land owners paid very little in comparison
and had quite a cushy life.
Double
standards are becoming a common theme in today’s society and it’s these double
standards that divide nations and lead to sub-optimal solutions for national
growth. We need governments to close the loop holes and gather the tax income
they are due, for the future good of the nation and its people.
References
Duke,
S. (2012). Vodafone faces new tax scandal. The Sunday Times, Business, 10th
June, p.1.
Duke,
S. (2012). Luxembourg: home sweet home for tax avoiders. The Sunday Times,
Business, 10th June, p.9.
No comments:
Post a Comment