An effective board,
consisting of executive and non-executive directors, should be viewed as a key
requirement for organisations of all sizes competing in today’s global economy,
allowing organisations to be lead from the top and to be able to create focus
and confidence in uncertain times and uncertain markets. The board should be a
source of competitive advantage that can be used to enhance an organisations
short and long-term performance, thus giving confidence to its shareholders,
employees, suppliers and customers.
In fact a superior
board should lead to superior financial results, compared to those of their competitors;
and these strategic leaders will develop organisations that have highly
developed people who are flexible and focused on their own needs, the needs of
their departments and the needs of their organisation, leading to the
organisations greatest asset being its intellectual capital.
History tells us that
most board members, especially non-executives, are either selected by the
initial stakeholders, the financial backers or the CEO based on personal
relationships, affiliations or friendships and are expected to vote with those
who ‘brought them in’; and hence Epstein and Roy (2004) believed this was the
reason why “many directors have not been the active counsellors, vigilant
monitors or sceptical judges that are necessary for high performance boards and
high performance organisations” (p.5).
In fact Westphal and
Khanna found that directors who challenged management decision making on
strategic issues tended to be informally sanctioned by other directors.
Although institutional investors have pressured outside directors to adopt a
more controlling posture, Westphal and Khanna found that such pressure has not
weakened normative sanctions against challenging the CEO on strategic issues
and may even have strengthened them as corporate leaders ‘close ranks’ to
protect their decision making autonomy (2003, cited in Westphal and Stern,
2006:174).
Ruigrok, Peck and
Keller (2006) commented that “outside directors are a potentially rich pool of
expertise; as the involvement of outside directors in strategic decision making
has the potential to enhance the quality of strategic decisions and thereby to
improve the company’s competitive position” (p.1221). Where “inside directors
on the other hand depend directly on the CEO for their career advancements, and
may thus hesitate to oppose and challenge strategic proposals of the CEO”
(p.1206).
Although there are
different thoughts as to what an organisational board’s key responsibilities
are, most agree that the board has a fiduciary duty to represent the
corporation’s interests in protecting and creating shareholder value and must
determine whether the company is managed well to achieve long term success. As
such high performing boards must achieve three core objectives (Epstein and
Roy, 2004);
1) Provide superior strategic guidance to
ensure the organisations sustainable growth and prosperity;
2) To ensure accountability of the
organisation to its stakeholders, including shareholders, employees, customers,
suppliers, regulators and the community; and
3) To ensure that a highly qualified and
effective executive team is managing the company.
Creating a board with
the correct knowledge and skill set will have a direct impact on the strategic
leadership and corporate governance equation. There has been considerable
research into the key knowledge areas that should be understood (and
practically applied) by board members, and these include; corporate strategy
formulation; competition; global markets; leadership; strategy implementation;
change management; group effectiveness; organisational design; government,
investor and community relationships; functional knowledge and ethics.
So just how effective
is your board? Do you have a board with the right mix of executive and non-executive
directors – do you have a group of people who;
1) Challenge
the organisation to be the best it can be;
2) Bring
a set of special skills and business networks;
3) Have
a passion for the organisation and its future;
4) Aren’t
afraid to challenge the status quo;
5) Willingly
commit the time and effort required to perform their role – they go the extra
mile, for the organisation.
Finding the right
non-executive directors, should be a priority and key responsibility for all
CEO’s and Chairmen/women – as it’s this special group that can turn good
organisations into great organisations.
References
Brownbill, N. (2008).
Exploring the relationship between Strategic Leadership and Corporate
Governance. Paper presented at the 8th International Conference on
Studying Leadership.
Epstein, M.J., and Roy,
M-J. (2004). Improving the performance of corporate boards: Identifying and
measuring the key drivers of success. Journal of General Management. Vol.29,
No.3: 1-23.
Ruigrok, W., Peck,
S.I., and Keller, H. (2006). Board characteristics and involvement in strategic
decision making: Evidence from Swiss companies. Journal of Management Studies,
43:5, July: 1201-1226.
Westphal, J.D., and
Stern, I. (2006). The other pathway to the boardroom: Interpersonal influence
behaviour as a substitute for elite credentials and majority status in
obtaining board appointments. Administration Science Quarterly, 51: 169-204.
No comments:
Post a Comment