It’s often not clear what makes one
organisation give better customer service compared to another; or why within
the same organisation, one individual will seem to have a natural ‘gift’ to
want to look after a customer, whereas other individuals give the impression
that they couldn’t really care less.
The media is full off articles about
poor service, though hardly ever on the front pages anymore – where you’ll have
stories about Vodafone still holding people to their mobile phone contracts,
even after they’ve died; or banks like Santander losing client’s money and not
being in a rush to find it or simply fobbing customers off who ask for a basic
service. Stories in the press are mostly about large corporates giving poor
levels of service, but this doesn’t mean that it’s only large corporates that
give poor service (as we’re probably only to well aware); it seems to happen
within all sizes of organisation and across most, if not all, industry sectors.
So what drives some organisations and
individuals to genuinely want to offer customer service and to respond when they
find that their standards fail; and what drives other organisations and
individuals to not really care about the customer and service, and how does
this segment actually get away with it?
In some industry sectors, size
definitely matters, where organisations are in a quantity rather than quality
driven environment. The mobile phone industry, banking, insurance, etc. are all
quantity based businesses – where there seems to be a wide spectrum of
acceptable levels of ‘customer service’ which not only differs across the
different organisations, but can differ significantly across different branches
within the same organisation.
In these industries there can be a
disconnect between the ‘vision’ that the executive desire, compared to what
actually happens on the ground in respect of recruitment, training, day-to-day
management, complaints procedures and follow-up. Though if there is a
disconnect then it’s the executive who are accountable for making sure that their
corporate vision for customer service, is translated through to action on the
ground.
At the other extreme there are small,
often one-man organisations, like plumbers; electricians; garden service; home
renovations; etc, that also seem to cover the whole spectrum with respect to
customer servce to the people focused on giving great service and value for
money; to those that seem to get a ‘kick’ out of ripping people off, and even
more amazingly not only getting away with it, but being able to continue operating
in their chosen profession.
Whether a large corporate or a small
one-man firm, most are in business to make money and to make some form of
profit so they can at least survive where, and I’m not sure if it’s the
exception or the rule, some firms want to maximise their profitability,
regardless of the potential loss of long-term customers due to poor service.
The fact is, whether we like to admit it
or not, the customer receives the service that they and the organisation are
prepared to accept, i.e. you will be treated, how you allow yourself to be
treated – meaning that most of the time customers don’t complain enough as, it
takes time and effort and there’s often a cost involved, whether it’s phoning
the customer complaints line or putting a stamp on a letter.
Admittedly this is a very generic
statement as customers in some countries are more prevalent to complaining than
others; and the laws for consumers are much tighter in some countries compared
to others – so it’s not just about the customer, but the legal and cultural
‘set-up’ in your own country.
Another key issue at this particular point
in the global economic cycle is that the majority of people have become much
more cost conscious during the economic downturn and hence focus more on price
than service – though that doesn’t mean they’ll accept inferior quality products
or services; unless in their perception it equates to value for money or they
simply cannot afford to complain.
The concept of service and the levels
they want to give squarely rests with the organisation – and it’s the
leadership’s responsibility to ensure that the standards they require and
envisage as part of their strategy and image, are transformed into action on
the ground.
But it's customers that allow poor
customer service to raise its head and become an acceptable behaviour, whether
it's an organisation, a branch or an individual – because not only don’t we
complain enough, but ‘we’ also go back and ask for more – simply reinforcing the
bad behaviour as acceptable.