There are seemingly loads of articles
and research that clearly shows that ‘attractive’ men and women earn more than
those deemed less attractive.
In a book entitled ‘The Beauty Bias: The
Injustice of Appearance in Life and Law’ by Deborah Rhode; she mentions how “physically
attractive women and men earn more than average-looking ones, and very plain
people earn less. In the labour market as a whole (though not, for example, in
astrophysics), looks have a bigger impact on earnings than education, though
intelligence - mercifully enough - is valued more highly still.” (cited in The
Economist, 27th August, 2011).
Deborah Rhode highlights how “not
everything comes easier: good-looking women seeking high-flying jobs in
particularly male fields may be stymied by the “bimbo effect” until they prove
their competence and commitment. But the importance of beauty in the labour
market is far more pervasive than one might think. The same is true in other
markets. Women have traditionally traded looks for economic support in
marriage. A Chinese study confirms that the husbands of unappealing women earn
about 10% less than those of their dishier counterparts. Attractive people also
have an easier time getting a loan than plain folks, even as they are less
likely to pay it back. They receive milder prison sentences and higher damages
in simulated legal proceedings. In America more people say they have felt
discriminated against for their appearance than because of their age, race or
ethnicity. Pretty people, it seems, have all the luck.”
In another article in 2011 Alan Hall
wrote in the Mail On-Line that “good-looking people worried about higher
education shouldn't worry. Beauty is every bit as good as a BA when it comes to
getting on, a new study says. Researchers at the Leuphana University of
Lüneburg in northern Germany have found wages, promotions and perks at work are
linked to a person's attractiveness. While looks have long been thought
essential for women to climb the corporate ladder, they say, they are even more
important for men.”
This is backed by further research, for
example, in an article in Forbes Magazine in 2011 Susan Adams comments on
research by Daniel Hamermesh that found below-average-looking men earn 17% less
than those considered good-looking, while below-average-looking females earn
12% less than their attractive counterparts.
All this research from 2011 is still
alive and well today, with an article published in the Mail On-Line on 10 March
2013, where they state that “Men blessed with the good looks to match George
Clooney can reap the benefits in the workplace, says a study. Handsome men can
command 22 per cent more in earnings than colleagues doing the same job because
of their looks. But men with 'below-average' looks will pay the price for their
appearance, earning 26 per cent less than an average-looking man in the same
job. They were also 15 per cent more likely to be unemployed than more
attractive men.”
Of course one may think this is unfair
as we don’t choose how we are born and start to look around us at others in our
peer group to see if their career path might be influenced by anything other
than their performance – but it’s not the peer group you should be looking at –
it’s the leadership. It’s a damning condemnation of today’s leadership if they
are so shallow that they are influenced by looks when it comes to offering
jobs; promotions and other perks.
Maybe this kind of research gives an
indication as to why there is such a large pool of immature leadership in today’s
global world and if we really want to see improvements in leadership throughout
the globe, then this should be a kick-start to those involved in leadership
development and leadership appointments to question the success criteria that
drives their decision making.
References
Adams.
S. (2011). Does Beauty Really Pay. [On-line http://www.forbes.com/sites/susanaadams/2011/08/03/does-beauty-really-pay]. Accessed 2nd
June 2013.
Hall,
A. (2011). Looks are as important as brains to career success, a recent study
shows. The Mail On-line. 21st December 2011. [On-line: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2077056/Looks-important-brains-career-success-says-new-study.html]
Rhode,
D. (2011). The Beauty Bias: The Injustice of Appearance in Life and Law. Oxford
University Press; USA. [cited in the Economist: http://www.economist.com/node/21526782]
No comments:
Post a Comment